Buy This Entire Record For
Armstrong v. Tescher
United States District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division
May 8, 2014
MUIRIA ARMSTRONG and A.A., biological daughter and minor child, Plaintiffs,
JOLYNE TESCHER, RHONDA BELGARDE, CAROLYN DAVIS, KATHLEEN CASHELL, RACHEL BRANDEN, STACY DWYER, MARK VUCUROVICH, KIM POLICH, BRAD NEWMAN, MARY KAY STARIN, SUSAN DAY, JENNIFER DOWNING, DAN DOWNING, TIM FOX, RICHARD OPPER, EILEEN JOYCE, JAMES REAVIS, and LORI MALONEY, Defendants.
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch, (Doc. 3), regarding Plaintiff Muiria Armstrong's Complaint, in which she seeks relief with respect to the custody of her minor daughter, A.A., (Doc. 2). Because Armstrong is proceeding in forma pauperis, upon filing, this matter was referred to Judge Lynch. See L.R. 72.2(a). Judge Lynch conducted a prescreening as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and filed his Findings and Recommendations on April 10, 2014. (Doc. 3 at 8.) Armstrong filed a responsive document on April 30, 2014. (Doc. 6 at 14.) Although untimely,  Armstrong's response will now be considered on review of Judge Lynch's report.
The Court reviews de novo those portions of the Findings and Recommendations to which Armstrong objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Otherwise, the Findings and Recommendations are reviewed for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Armstrong filed a document entitled "Objection to dismiss RQST for Counsel" on April 30, 2014. (Doc. 6.) Although Armstrong labeled this document an "Objection, " the document simply reasserts her grievances and fails to directly rejoin any of the analysis or conclusions presented in Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations. In the absence of any specific objections, the Court reviews Judge Lynch's determination that the Court must abstain under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-45 (1971), for clear error. Finding none, the Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations in-full.
IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations, (Doc. 3), are ADOPTED IN-FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter by separate document a judgment of dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of ...