Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Dean

United States District Court, D. Montana, Helena Division

July 15, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
MARCUS DEAN, Defendant.

ORDER

CHARLES C. LOVELL, District Judge.

The Court referred the Petition for Revocation (Doc. 59) for hearing, findings of fact, and recommendation to Magistrate Judge Johnston by order filed on July 8, 2015 (Doc. 61).[1] Pending now before the Court is the Report of Findings & Recommendations ("F&R") filed by Magistrate Judge Johnston on July 13, 2015 (Doc. 70). Defendant has waived the 14-day objection period.

I. Background

The following facts are taken from the F&R:

1. Marcus Dean violated Standard Condition 7 of his supervised release by failing to abstain from the consumption of methamphetamine on July 3, 2015.
2. Marcus Dean violated Special Condition 1 of his supervised release by failing to appear for a scheduled urinalysis test on July 3, 2015.

(Doc. 70 at 4.) At the revocation hearing, Defendant Dean admitted that he violated the two conditions as alleged by the petition. (Doc. 70 at 3.)

In the F&R, Judge Johnston recommends that this Court find the Defendant has violated two conditions of his supervised release and sentence Defendant Dean to a term of imprisonment of two weeks, with a lifetime term of supervised release to follow under the same conditions of supervision as previously imposed. Judge Johnston recommends that this Court order Defendant to remain in custody until July 20, 2015.

II. Standard of Review

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) this Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." The district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). If an objection is made, the court reviews de novo only the portion to which the objection was made, the remainder is reviewed for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). No objection having been made, this Court reviews the F&R accordingly.

III. Discussion

This is Defendant's first revocation proceeding. Defendant's violation grade is C, his criminal history category is III, and his Chapter 7 Policy Guideline Range is 5 to 11 months imprisonment. Defendant is required to serve a term of lifetime supervision. The government requested a departure from the guideline range, and the Defendant requested a custody sentence of one month. Magistrate Judge Johnston finds that sufficient mitigating circumstances exist to vary downward from the guidelines to a custody sentence of two weeks. Defendant self-reported his use of methamphetamine and failure to appear for a scheduled urinalysis test, but there have been no other violations since his release from prison on March 13, 2015.

IV. Revocation Determination and Sentence

The Court therefore finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant violated two conditions of his supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Defendant's supervised release should be, and hereby ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.