Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Two Firearms

United States District Court, D. Montana, Billings Division

May 9, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
TWO FIREARMS, 85 ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION Defendants.

          FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND ORDER OF FORFEITURE

          SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge.

         Plaintiff, the United States of America, has moved for an entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2). Upon considering the pleadings filed herein, the Court hereby makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

         FINDINGS OF FACT

         1. On October 6, 2016, Plaintiff, United States of America, filed in this cause its Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem against the defendant property, consisting of the following: Glock Inc. 23 GEN4 Pistol, Cal. 40, Serial Number YVC243; Stag Arms 6.8 Rifle, Cal. 68, Serial Number 42658; 85 rounds of Hornady Ammunition, Cal. 6S, to forfeit property involved in a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), and subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d). (Doc. l, ¶l).

         2. The Court issued a Warrant of Arrest in Rem (Doc. 4) and the defendant property was arrested on October 20, 2016. (Doc. 5).

         3. Examination of the Court files and records in this case shows that pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(4)(b)(i) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States provided "direct notice" of this action to known potential claimant Kelly Moffitt on October 14, 2016, by mailing to her a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem and Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture by first-class mail and certified mail to the address Kelly Moffitt provided in her administrative claim. (Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture, Doc. 2; Declaration in Support of U.S. Motion for Entry of Defaults, Doc. 9, ¶¶ 5-7, and Exh. 1, 2 and 3; Supplemental Rule G(4)(b)(iii)(E)). The certified mail receipt for Kelly Moffitt was signed for by Fern Moffitt on October 19, 2016. The first-class mailing sent to Kelly Moffitt at the same address was not returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office by the U.S. Postal Service. (Declaration in Support of Default, Doc. 9, ¶ 7, Exh. 3).

         4. The Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture (Doc. 2) sets forth the deadlines for filing a verified claim to the defendant property, and answer or Rule 12 motion as required by Supplemental Rules G(5)(a) and (b). Kelly Moffitt failed to file a verified claim as instructed in the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture at page 2-3, ¶ ¶ 3-4. (Doc. 2). Moffitt also failed to file an answer or a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, within 21 days after the filing of a claim as required by Supplemental Rule G(5)(b) and as instructed in the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture at page 3, ¶5. (Doc. 2).

         5. Service by publication of the forfeiture action pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) was also provided to potential claimants, both known and unknown, by publishing on the government's asset forfeiture web site the Notice of Forfeiture Action for 30 consecutive days, beginning on October 13, 2016 and ending on November 11, 2016. (See Declaration of Publication, Doc. 6, Attachment 1). No claim was filed with the Court within 60 days of the first day of publication by any known or unknown potential claimant, as required by Supplemental Rule G(5)(a)(ii)(B).

         6. After the United States moved for the entry of defaults of Kelly Moffitt and unknown potential claimants, supported by Declarations (Doc. 6, 8, 9), the Clerk of District Court entered the defaults of known potential claimant Kelly Moffitt, and unknown potential claimants on January 25, 2017. (Doc. 10).

         7. The United States was also able to locate an additional known potential claimant, Wesley Hoffman, at the Adams County Detention Facility, in Brighton, Colorado, after the prior Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture (Doc. 2) was returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office. (Declaration in Support of Default of Potential Claimant Hoffman, Doc. 14, ¶¶ 6-7). A second Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture and a copy of the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was personally served on Wesley Hoffman on January 26, 2017, at the Adams County Detention Facility. (Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture, Doc. 11, ¶ 1; Return of Service, Doc. 12). The Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture again set forth the deadlines for filing a verified claim to the defendant property and answer or Rule 12 motion as required by Supplemental Rule G(5)(a) and (b). (Doc. 11, ¶¶ 3-6). Wesley Hoffman failed to file a verified claim or an answer or Rule 12 motion as instructed in the Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture.

         8. After the United States moved for entry of default supported by declaration (Doc. 13, 14), the Clerk of District Court entered the default of known potential claimant Wesley Hoffman on April 12, 2017. (Doc. 15).

         Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Court makes the following conclusions of law.

         CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

         1. The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355. The United States has filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem to forfeit the defendant property consisting of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.